MMS Study Puts $1.4 Billion Price Tag on Defensive Medicine in
Massachusetts
December 15, 2009
As Massachusetts continues trying to keep up with the rising cost of
its widely acclaimed health care reform program, a first-of-its-kind
study by the MMS reveals that most of the state’s doctors practice
defensive medicine for fear of malpractice lawsuits — at a cost to
the state’s health care system of more than $1.4 billion a
year.
&This survey clearly shows that the fear of… being sued is
driving physicians to defensive medicine and dramatically increasing
health care costs,” said Manish K. Sethi, M.D., one of the
study’s lead researchers and a member of the MMS Board of Trustees
and its Committee on Professional Liability. “This poses a
critical issue, as soaring costs are the biggest threat to the success
of Massachusetts health reform efforts.
The “Investigation of Defensive Medicine in
Massachusetts” is the first survey to directly link
defensive-medicine practices with Medicare cost data. The survey is also
believed to be one of the largest of its kind, with nearly 900
physicians in eight specialties (anesthesiology, emergency medicine,
family medicine, internal medicine, general surgery, neurosurgery,
orthopedics, and obstetrics/gynecology) taking part between November
2007 and April 2008.
Surveyed doctors were asked about their use of seven tests and
procedures — plain film X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, ultrasounds,
laboratory testing, specialty referrals and consultations, and hospital
admissions. The results showed that 83 percent of those surveyed
practiced defensive medicine — and that an average of 18 to 28
percent of all tests, procedures, referrals, and consultations were
ordered for defensive reasons. Thirteen (13) percent of hospitalizations
also resulted from defensive practices, the survey showed.
Nationwide, the study noted, “Some estimates report that the
practice of defensive medicine costs the American health care system in
excess of $100 billion annually.”
Doctors Mistrust Liability System
“Physicians practice defensive medicine because they
don’t trust the medical liability system,” said Alan
Woodward, M.D., vice chair of the MMS Committee on Professional
Liability and a past MMS president. “This survey should provide a
strong impetus for fundamental liability reform. Reducing defensive
medicine in Massachusetts could dramatically reduce costs and at the
same time improve patient safety, access to care, and quality of
care.”
President-Elect Barack Obama and others who support health care
reform nationally have said much the same thing and have offered
proposals to revamp the professional liability system as part of their
overall reform agendas (see related story).
Dr. Sethi and his fellow researcher, Robert H. Aseltine Jr., Ph.D.,
of the Institute for Public Health Research at the University of
Connecticut Health Center, said they believe the actual cost of
defensive medicine is “significantly higher” than their
survey quantified. That’s largely because the survey did not
include tests and diagnostic procedures ordered by physicians in other
specialties or ask about certain other defensive medicine practices,
such as ordering unnecessary prescriptions.
Beyond Cost to Access
In addition to the most obvious and costly practices already
mentioned, a more subtle form of defensive medicine — physicians
avoiding high-risk procedures and/or high-risk patients — results
in reduced patient access to care.
The MMS survey found that 38 percent of participating physicians
reported they reduced the number of high-risk services they performed,
with orthopedic surgeons (55 percent), obstetricians/gynecologists (54
percent), and general surgeons (48 percent) reporting the highest
frequency of this. “Because of the malpractice environment, many
specialists have closed their practices, stopped performing high-risk
procedures, or reduced their care of high-risk patients,” Dr.
Woodward said. “As a result, many smaller communities have little
or no access to medical specialists.”
Dr. Woodward added that patient safety issues also arise because of
defensive medicine. These include the risk of medically unnecessary
radiation exposure and possible severe allergic reactions to contrast
dyes used in diagnostic imaging. Also, the number of Caesarean births
and the attendant risk of surgery-related complications have increased
as a result of liability concerns.
Download
and read the full report. (.pdf, 19 pages, 830 kb)
–Tom Walsh
| malpractice, defensive emdicine, professional liability, medical liability |
|