The Physician's Corner
By Henry Tulgan, M.D., FACP
The medical community and others now appreciate that apology for
medical mistakes may reduce malpractice litigation and even in
successful actions, reduce awards. This change in approach from the
traditional silence when errors occur has been endorsed not only by most
physicians, but also by attorneys, risk managers, administrators and
insurers. In many states, laws have been enacted to protect physicians
who apologize to varying degrees and the topic has been the subject of
recent books and articles in national medical journals.
How comprehensive an apology should be is less clear. Although some
experts advocate full disclosure, others suggest a more simple
empathetic statement. The key in either case is how genuinely the
statement is expressed. What is evident is that each patient should be
dealt with individually.
Dr. Aaron Lazare, former Dean and Chancellor of University of
Massachusetts Medical School and renowned author on the subject of
apology, gives the following definition: (1) an admission of
responsibility for an offense followed by expressions of regret, remorse
& forbearance, (2) justification or explanation (apologia).
Dr. Lazare also cautions that there are various types of failed
acknowledgements that include offering a vague and/or incomplete
offense; using the passive voice; making the offense conditional;
minimizing the offense or using the empathic “I am
sorry.”
In all adverse situations, apologies should be prompt and sincere. If
promises are made to follow through on investigating the circumstances
more fully, this action must be taken, documented and communicated to
the relevant parties. Since litigation of malpractice may not occur for
several years, legal experts advocate having a thoughtful communication
strategy in place immediately after the adverse incident has taken
place.
Some health care institutions have begun to craft specific policies in
this area. Legislators in 35 states, including Massachusetts, have an
apology law on the books. But to date, there is no standard model.
Risk Management Strategies
-
Apology is now considered appropriate when medical mistakes
occur.
-
Apology may reduce litigation or awards.
-
Apology should be sincere and empathetic but should not assume
physician responsibility for the event.
-
Litigation may be delayed for several years.
-
Follow through promises must be kept.
Next: CME
Exam Instructions
|
|
|
References
- MA Medical Law Report, Governors Apology Bill Would Protect Physicians,
Hospitals, May 2, 2011
- Payment Reform Legislation, An Act - Improving the Quality of Healthcare and
Controlling Costs, See Section 20 for
Apology
- Sorry Works! Coalition, http://www.sorryworks.net/laws.phtml, accessed on
June 10, 2011
- Saying sorry, Michigan project’s response...,
CommonWeatlh, accessed on July 15, 2011
- Testimony of the Massachusetts Medical Society, In
Support of Specific Sections of H 1519, An Act Reducing Medical Errors
and Improving Patient Safety, Before the Joint Committee on Public
Health, June 14, 2011
- Lazare A: On Apology. New York: Oxford University Press,
2004.
- Leape L.: Full disclosure and apology: An idea whose time has come.
Physician Exec 32:16–18, Mar.–Apr. 2006.
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: 2006
Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook.
Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources, 2005.
- Kraman S., Hamm G.: Risk management: Extreme honesty may be the best
policy. Ann Intern Med 131:963–967, Dec. 21, 1999.
- Kraman S.S., et al.: John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety Awards.
Advocacy: The Lexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Jt Comm J Qual
Improv 28:646–650, Dec. 2002.
- Boothman R.: How open, honest disclosure can reduce claims, costs,
and promote patient safety improvement. Lecture given at the annual
meeting of the Greater New York Hospital Association, New York City, May
13, 2005.
- Kowalczyk L.: Hospitals study when to apologize to patients. The
Boston Globe, Jun. 24, 2005, p. A1.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|