Electronic Health Records Surge Despite Barriers
By Kimberly Ashton
Although Massachusetts has a head start on the national effort to
digitize medical records, much work remains to be done before the state
can meet President Barack Obama’s goal of having all health
documents computerized by 2015.
The path ahead isn’t straightforward, and physicians must pay
attention to the potential legal risks involved in using electronic
health records (EHRs). A number of technological and financial hurdles
stand between the government mandates and getting the nation’s
medical system wired.
According to Kristina Barry, a spokeswoman for the state Office of
Health and Human Services, 90 percent of private medical practices in
Massachusetts are still not using EHRs. It can take years to select a
vendor and set up electronic records in a typical medical office.
To meet deadlines and be eligible for incentives, physicians should
start preparing now for the complete transition to electronic records,
said James Bush, director of practice services at Massachusetts eHealth
Collaborative.
“In order to qualify for incentives, providers really need to act
now,” Bush said.
Incentive payments for physicians who implement EHR systems are
scheduled to begin in 2011 for doctors who have EHRs that meet a
“health information standard” and a “meaningful use
standard,” neither of which has been defined yet, Bush said.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will be leading the
formal rulemaking process to define “meaningful use
standard” under the new law, according to discussions at a federal
HIT Policy Committee in mid-June.
Failure to switch to EHRs won’t just result in missing out on
funding. As of 2015, adoption of EHRs will be required for physicians to
gain hospital licensure. And 2012 is the deadline for computerized
physician order entry systems, Bush said.
The federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, passed Feb. 17,
allocated nearly $20 billion for health information technology across
the country.
“We estimate approximately $500 million over five years in
[federal] funding” will be given to Massachusetts, said Barry.
States are required to match $1 for every $10 provided in federal EHR
implementation grants in 2011, $1 for every $7 in 2012, and $1 for every
$3 in federal grants in 2013 and beyond.
In order to make sure the state has funds allocated to match the
expected federal funds, the state Legislature in August allotted $25
million per year over the next seven years for adoption of health
information technology. The amount was later cut to $15 million, with
funding allocated only for one year.
Before the state doles out the money, the state’s nine-member
Health Information Technology Council – which was appointed by
Gov. Deval Patrick – must first decide how it will be
distributed.
Attorney David Szabo, who sits on the council and is a partner at
Nutter, McClennen & Fish in Boston, said the council will have
control over allocating the state funds, but it’s still unclear
what role it might play in doling out the federal money.
The council is now in the process of gathering feedback from health care
providers, software engineers and other interested parties, and there is
no date set to distribute the funds, according to Szabo.
Next: A
Costly Endeavor
|
|
|
|