Five Insurers Now Agree to New York Physician Ranking Rules
November 21, 2007
A total of five health insurance companies -- including the top
three in the country -- have now agreed to comply with rigorous new
rules for physician ranking plans, setting a benchmark for the
development of a nationwide standard. United Healthcare and the Group
Health Insurance/Health Insurance Plan (GHI/HIP) of Greater New York
this week joined Aetna, CIGNA, and Wellpoint in accepting the principles
developed by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
Aetna, Cigna, United, and WellPoint will apply the principles
nationwide.
The New York model expands on the principles for physician tiering
programs that the Massachusetts Medical Society adopted earlier this
month. The Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission (GIC) requires its
participating health plans to utilize a proprietary ranking system. The
system affects nearly 300,000 state and municipal employees in
Massachusetts.
“While the GIC has made some changes in its program in response
to physician concerns,” said B. Dale Magee, M.D., president of the
Massachusetts Medical Society, “it has not been able to ensure
accuracy, reliability, or validity. It falls significantly short of the
New York attorney general’s mandate for these principles, as well
as for independent oversight.”
Cuomo’s office drafted its model with input from the Medical
Society of the State of New York, the American Medical Association, and
several consumer advocacy groups. It requires insurers to fully disclose
all aspects of any ranking system and hire an independent “ratings
examiner” to monitor compliance.
The New York settlement agreements declare, “Consumers are
entitled to receive reliable and accurate information unclouded by
potential conflicts of interest. The independence, integrity, and
verifiable nature of the rating process are paramount.”
“GHI and HIP believe that consumers must have access to
accurate and useful information about their physicians,” said
HIP’s executive vice president, Dan Dragalin, M.D.
According to a statement from Cuomo’s office, insurers
will:
-
Ensure that rankings for doctors are not based solely on cost and
clearly identify the degree to which any ranking is based on cost;
-
Use established national standards to measure quality and cost
efficiency, including measures endorsed by the National Quality
Forum and other generally accepted national standards;
-
Employ several techniques to foster more accurate physician
comparisons, including risk adjustment and valid sampling;
-
Disclose to consumers how the program is designed and how doctors
are ranked, and provide a process for consumers to register complaints
about the system;
-
Disclose to physicians how rankings are designed, and provide a
process to appeal disputed ratings;
-
Nominate and pay for the ratings examiner, subject to the approval
of the New York attorney general, who will oversee compliance with all
aspects of the new ranking model and report to the attorney
general’s office every six months. The ratings examiner must be a
“national standard setting organization” and will be
national in scope, independent, and an Internal Revenue Code §
501(c)(3) organization.
United Healthcare had been scheduled to start its ranking program in
New York in December. It said it will comply with the agreement before
launching the program. GHI/HIP accepted the agreement prior to designing
its program.
| physician ranking, tiering principles, pay for performance, p4p |
|