Health Care Reform
Comprehensive national health system reform, aimed at expanding the number of insured Americans, controlling the growth of health care spending, improving Americans' health status and supporting quality improvement initiatives, was signed into law on March 23, 2010.
Read More »
Statement from MMS on King v. Burwell Decision
June 25, 2015
The Massachusetts Medical Society welcomes today’s Supreme Court decision safeguarding access to crucial health care service for millions of patients, said Massachusetts Medical Society President Dennis M. Dimitri, MD.
MMS Statement on Today’s ACA Court Rulings
July 22, 2014
Without subsidies, millions of Americans may find insurance beyond their reach, and that will lead to poorer health for many of our citizens.
Division of Insurance Memo on Price Transparency
December 13, 2013
Mass. Division of Insurance guidance to health plans on complying with the law making information on the cost of services and procedures available to patients. (.pdf, 4 pages)
Health Care Legislation: Full Text and Summaries
Massachusetts Health Care Reform
Massachusetts Health Connector
What's new about the Massachusetts health insurance exchange for individuals and families, small businesses, and students, with links to online enrollment.
The Facts About Massachusetts Health Reform | Updated November 2014
MMS fact sheet covers Massachusetts legislation's impact on:
- Patients' access to care
- The costs of health care
- Employer participation
MMS Principles for Health Care Reform
1. Physician leadership. Physician leadership is seen as essential for the implementation of new payment reform models. Strong leadership from primary care and specialty care physicians in both the administrative structure of accountable care
organizations (ACOs) and other payment reform models, as well as in policy development, cost containment and clinical decision-making processes, is key.
2. One size will not fit all. One single payment model will not be successful in all types of practice settings. Many physician groups will have a great deal of difficulty making a transition due to their geographic location, patient mix, specialty, technical and organizational readiness, and
3. Deliberate and careful. Efforts must be undertaken to guard against the risk of negative unintended consequences in any introduction of a new payment system.
4. Fee-for-service payments still have a
role. While a global payment model could encourage collaboration among providers, care coordination, and a more holistic approach to a patient's care, fee-for-service payments will likely should be a component of subset of any global payment
5. Infrastructure support. Sufficient resources for a comprehensive health information technology infrastructure and hiring an appropriate team of physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and other relevant staff are essential across all
payment reform models.
6. Proper risk adjustment. In order to take on a bundled, global payment or other related payment models, funding must be adequate, and adequate risk adjustment for patient panel sickness, socioeconomic status, and other factors is needed.
Current risk adjustment tools have limitations, and payers must include physician input as tools evolve and provide enough flexibility regarding resources in order to ensure responsible approaches are implemented. In addition, ACOs and like entities must have the infrastructure in place and individuals with the
skills to understand and manage risk.
7. Transparency. There must be transparency across all aspects of administrative, legal, measurement, and payment policies across payers regarding ACO structures and new payment models. There must also be transparency in the financing of
physicians across specialties. Trust is a necessary ingredient of a successful ACO or other payment reform model. The negotiations between specialists, primary care physicians, and payers will be a determining factor in establishing this trust.
8. Proper measurements and good data. Comprehensive and actionable data from payers regarding the true risks of patients is key to any payment reform model. Without meaningful, comprehensive data, it becomes impractical to take on risk. Nationally accepted, reliable, and validated clinical
measures must be used to both measure quality performance and efficiency and evaluate patient experience. Data must be accurate, timely, and made available to physicians for both trending and the ability to implement quality improvement and cost effective care.
The ability to correct inaccurate data is also important.
9. Patient expectations. Patient expectations need to be realigned to support the more realistic understanding of benefits and risks of tests and clinical services or procedures when considering new payment reform models. Physicians and payers
must work together to provide a public health educational campaign, with an opportunity for patients to provide input as appropriate and engage in relevant processes.
10. Patient incentives. Patient accountability coupled with physician accountability will be an effective element for success with payment reform. An important aspect of benefit design by payers is to exclude cost sharing for preventive care and
other selected services.
11. Benefit design. Benefit designs should be fluid and innovative. Any contemplation of regulation and legislation with regard to benefit design should balance mandating minimum benefits, administrative simplification, with sufficient
freedom to create positive transparent incentives for both patients and physicians to maximize quality and value.
12. Professional liability reform. Defensive medicine is not in the patient's best interest and increases the cost of healthcare. In an environment where physicians have the incentive to do less, but patients request more, physicians view
litigation as an inevitable outcome unless there is effective professional liability reform.
13. Antitrust reform. As large provider entities, ACO definitions and behavior may collide with anti-trust laws. The state legislature may be the adjudicator of antitrust issues. Accountable care organizations and other relevant payment
reform models should be adequately protected from existing antitrust, gain-sharing, and similar laws that currently restrict the ability of providers to coordinate care and collaborate on payment models.
14. Administrative simplification. Physicians and others who participate in new payment models, including ACOs, should work with payers to reduce administrative processes and complexities and related burdens that interfere with delivering
care. Physicians should be protected from undue administrative burden, or should be appropriately compensated for it.
15. The incentives to transition. In order to transition to a new model, incentives must be predominantly positive.
16. Planning must be flexible. Accommodations must be made to take into account the highly variable readiness of practices to move to a new system.
17. Primary care physician. All patients should be encouraged to have a primary care physician with whom they can build a trusted relationship and from whom they can receive care coordination.
18. Patient access. Health care reform must enable patient choice in access to physicians, hospitals and other services, while recognizing economic realities.
Adopted by the MMS House of
Delegates, May 21, 2011