Standardized procedures
In 2005, the Joint Commission
approved the 2006 National Patient Safety Goals, a set of 15 safety
objectives that hospitals were required to meet by this past
January.
Because communication breakdowns as
a result of handoffs present such significant error potential, Goal 2 of
these objectives requires hospitals to improve the effectiveness of
communication among caregivers, and includes specific measures to target
some of the most risk-fraught areas of communication.
For example, when a lab is
providing test results or taking an order for a test, the person
receiving the information is now required to record it and read it back.
Also, hospitals are required to stop using a list of confusing
abbreviations, acronyms, symbols and dose designations.
When it comes to transfers of care,
Goal 2 requires hospitals to "[i]mplement a standardized approach to
‘handoff’communications, including the opportunity to ask
and respond to questions." Boston health care lawyer Alan Rindler said
such an approach will ultimately help cut down on errors, particularly
those stemming from a failure to read a lab report or X-ray.
"Unfortunately there have been too
many instances where for [some] reason a report was never read or never
got into the patient’s record," said Rindler, a partner with
Rindler Morgan. JCAHO has not provided a specific formula that hospitals
must follow to be in compliance with the standardization requirement,
except requiring that any process include the opportunity to ask and
answer questions at the transfer point. But according to the commentary
that accompanies the goals, hospitals must also "define, communicate to
staff, and implement a process in which information about patient care
is communicated in a consistent manner."
Under the rules, a standardized
approach should identify: specific situations it applies to, who must be
involved in the communication, what specific information needs to be
communicated (critical patient information, anticipated changes in
condition or treatment and what to watch for) and what print or
electronic information should be available. "We expect hospitals to have
done this and have it in place," said Croteau. "If they’re not in
compliance, they have an opportunity to make the necessary chances.
They’re generally given a couple of opportunities. But if they
continue not to comply with this requirement, they will lose their
accreditation."
Next: Better
Communication
|
|
|
Resources
|
-
-
-
-
"Handoffs Causing Patient Harm: A Survey of Medical and
Surgical House Staff", Barrett T. Kitch, M.D., M.P.H.; Jeffrey B.
Cooper, Ph.D.; Warren M. Zapol, M.D.; Jessica E. Marder; Andrew Karson,
M.D., M.P.H.; Matt Hutter, M.D.; Eric G. Campbell, Ph.D., The Joint
Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, October 2008 Volume 34
Number 10
|
|
|
|
|
|