|
President’s Message
Good Communication Can Ward Off Tiering Problems
The new “tiered” health plans offered through the
Group Insurance Commission’s “Select and Save” program
are now in effect (see related article).
If you or your practice has received a tier-2
rating, the MMS urges you to contact the health plan for a better
understanding of tiering methods and to analyze the accuracy of the
data. Physicians have every right to review this information and have it
corrected if inaccuracies are found. Unfortunately, some physicians have
received limited assistance when asking one particular Select and Save
plan to discuss specifics. All health plans offering tiered products
must communicate openly with physicians and respond promptly and
professionally to our questions and concerns about accuracy and
fairness.
Another way to address the confusion swirling
around these plans is to talk openly about them with your patients,
practice colleagues, and office staff. Make sure everyone knows where
you stand on this.
Surveys suggest that fewer than 5 percent of
people given a choice would switch doctors or their existing health plan
based on tiering alone. This suggests that many patients are not only
very satisfied with their care, but also are savvy enough to know that
the bits of information used to tier physicians do not tell the whole
story about the quality of patient care. Still, although many patients
see tiering’s limitations, if you maintain strong
physician-patient relationships -- both clinically and
interpersonally -- you’ll help prevent tiering-based
controversy from arising.
If physicians in a group practice have been
tiered differently from one another, they should develop a
communications strategy so they speak to patients in a unified voice.
Reading the FAQs published in this issue of Vital Signs would
be a good first step. And don’t delay training your office staff
in how to communicate with patients about this new reality.
In responding to these programs, physicians
should take a long, hard look at their individual and group processes.
Although most of the rating data we’ve seen provides little or no
information to help doctors identify practice shortcomings, this new
transparency paradigm should prompt some self-examination. If you see
anything about the way you practice that is legitimately off-kilter,
take appropriate steps now to improve it.
Physicians must understand that business and
government will continue pressing for health care cost containment. In
response, individual physicians should redouble their efforts to adhere
to accepted clinical guidelines. And the Society will continue to
advocate forcefully for measures and methodologies that are both fair
and accurate.
– Kenneth R. Peelle, M.D.
| physician tiering, tiered, select and save, group insurance commission (gic), pay for performance (p4p) |
More Stories
19th-Century MMS Focused on Public Health
|